File
DOJ
Document DOJ-OGR-00021869
AI Analysis
Summary: The document argues that Maxwell's conviction did not result from a constructive amendment or prejudicial variance between the indictment and trial evidence, as the evidence at trial substantially corresponded to the indictment and did not prejudice Maxwell.
Significance: This document is potentially important because it discusses the legal arguments related to the conviction of Maxwell, specifically addressing whether there was a constructive amendment or variance between the indictment and trial evidence.
Key Topics:
constructive amendment
variance between indictment and trial evidence
prejudice to the defendant
Key People:
- Maxwell - defendant in the case