File
doj
Document doj-ogr-00010115
AI Analysis
Summary: The witness, Berke, is questioned about his experience with private investigators and his response to a hypothetical scenario involving a juror lying about their identity. Berke states that he has never encountered a situation where a juror lied about their identity and is unwilling to speculate on what steps he would take in such a scenario. The questioning attorney, Mr. Okula, presses Berke for answers, but Berke maintains that he cannot provide opinions on a hypothetical situation he has never experienced.
Significance: This deposition reveals concerns about the integrity of a trial due to a juror potentially lying about their identity and the witness's limited experience with such a scenario.
Key Topics:
Catherine Conrad, a suspended attorney, serving as Juror No. 1
The witness's experience with private investigators
The witness's response to a hypothetical scenario involving a juror lying about their identity
Key People:
- Berke - witness
- Catherine Conrad - Juror No. 1 and suspended attorney
- Mr. Okula - questioning attorney