THE VAULT
@xLatke

The Vault

The Public Record — Documenting the Epstein case files

File

A

← Back to home

Document A-5829

AI Analysis

Summary: The witness discusses a conversation with someone from the Brune firm about Juror No. 1 and a potential connection to a suspended attorney. The witness didn't receive detailed information about the connection but recalls discussing Juror No. 1's possible involvement in a personal injury case. The witness is questioned about whether they would have wanted information about a written report on Juror No. 1's background.
Significance: This deposition reveals potential juror misconduct or bias and the communication between attorneys or investigators about this issue, which could be crucial in understanding the trial's context and potential grounds for appeal.
Key Topics: Juror No. 1's potential connection to a suspended New York attorney Information about Juror No. 1's background, including a potential personal injury case Communication between the witness and a representative from the Brune firm
Key People:
  • Juror No. 1 - juror in a trial
  • The witness (unnamed) - likely an attorney or investigator involved in the case
  • Catherine Conrad - possibly a person associated with Juror No. 1 or a related case
  • The suspended New York attorney - an attorney with a potential connection to Juror No. 1