THE VAULT
@xLatke

The Vault

The Public Record — Documenting the Epstein case files

File

A

← Back to home

Document A-5818

AI Analysis

Summary: The witness, Schoeman, testifies about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1, discussing a person with the same name who was a disbarred lawyer. The conversation occurred after the reading of a note from Juror No. 1. The witness and Ms. Trzaskoma concluded it was not the same person based on the voir dire questioning.
Significance: This deposition testimony reveals a conversation about Juror No. 1 that may be relevant to the case, potentially raising questions about juror identity or impartiality.
Key Topics: Conversation between the witness and Ms. Trzaskoma about Juror No. 1 Discussion about a person with the same name as Juror No. 1 who was a disbarred lawyer Voir dire questioning and its relevance to identifying Juror No. 1
Key People:
  • Schoeman - witness being deposed
  • Ms. Trzaskoma - person conversed with the witness about Juror No. 1
  • Juror No. 1 (Ms. Conrad) - juror being discussed
  • Someone at the Brune firm - potential discussant about Juror No. 1