File
A
Document A-5810
AI Analysis
Summary: The transcript captures the cross-examination of Ms. Edelstein by Mr. Schectman, focusing on a conversation about a suspended lawyer with the same name as Juror No. 1 and the decision not to raise a juror misconduct issue in a post-trial motion.
Significance: This document is potentially important as it reveals the thought process and discussions among the attorneys regarding a potential juror misconduct issue and their decision not to bring it to the court's attention.
Key Topics:
Juror misconduct investigation
Discussion about a suspended lawyer with the same name as Juror No. 1
Post-trial motion considerations
Key People:
- Ms. Edelstein - witness being cross-examined
- Mr. Schectman - attorney conducting cross-examination
- Ms. Brune - colleague of Ms. Edelstein, mentioned in conversation
- Ms. Trizaskoma - colleague of Ms. Edelstein, mentioned in conversation
- Juror No. 1 (Catherine Conrad) - juror in a trial
- Ms. Conrad - author of a post-trial letter