File
A
Document A-5804
AI Analysis
Summary: The deposition of Ms. Edelstein discusses the accuracy of statements in a court brief, specifically regarding the defendants' investigation into Catherine Conrad and their awareness of an Appellate Division suspension report. Edelstein confirms the accuracy of a statement in the brief but is questioned about the timing and extent of the investigation. The transcript highlights potential inconsistencies in the defendants' claims.
Significance: This deposition transcript reveals potential discrepancies in statements made by defendants in a court brief and sheds light on the investigation conducted by Theresa Trzaskoma.
Key Topics:
Appellate Division suspension report
Investigation by defendants
Accuracy of statements in a court brief
Key People:
- Edelstein - Witness being deposed
- Theresa Trzaskoma - Person involved in writing the brief and investigation
- Catherine Conrad - Person referenced in the Appellate Division suspension report