File
A
Document A-5801
AI Analysis
Summary: The deposition transcript shows Ms. Edelstein being questioned about the facts section of a brief she was involved with, specifically whether it accurately represents when she learned of an Appellate Division suspension report. She acknowledges that the brief might convey a misleading impression but denies any intention to mislead.
Significance: This document is potentially important as it reveals the questioning of a key witness about the accuracy and intentions behind the facts presented in a brief, potentially impacting the case's credibility and outcome.
Key Topics:
Questioning about a brief's facts section
Appellate Division suspension report
Juror note and its relation to the discovery of the report
Key People:
- Ms. Edelstein - Witness being deposed
- Dr. DeRosa - Person mentioned in the context of an incident at a podium
- Catherine Conrad - Sender of a letter relevant to the case