File
A
Document A-5798
AI Analysis
Summary: The deponent discusses their knowledge of Juror No. 1's background, the resources available for investigation, and the actions taken after receiving a juror letter. The deponent acknowledges having resources to investigate but chose not to initially due to doubts about the identity of Catherine Conrad. Later, they did call Nardello to assist in gathering information.
Significance: This deposition reveals potential issues with juror impartiality and the investigation into Catherine Conrad's background, which may be relevant to a court case.
Key Topics:
Juror No. 1's identity and potential bias
Investigation into Catherine Conrad's involvement in a lawsuit
Resources available for investigation
Key People:
- Catherine Conrad - Juror No. 1
- Theresa Trzaskoma - Person who potentially identified Catherine Conrad as a party to a lawsuit
- Nardello - Investigator or researcher