File
A
Document A-5786
AI Analysis
Summary: The witness is being questioned about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1 and a suspended lawyer with a similar name. Ms. Trzaskoma had considered the possibility that they were the same person but after reviewing voir dire responses, found inconsistencies. The witness ultimately concluded that they were not the same person.
Significance: This document is potentially important as it reveals the thought process and discussions surrounding the investigation into Juror No. 1's identity and potential connection to a suspended lawyer.
Key Topics:
Discussion between a witness and Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1
Investigation into the identity of Juror No. 1
Review of voir dire responses
Key People:
- Ms. Trzaskoma - person who discussed Juror No. 1 with the witness
- Juror No. 1 - juror whose identity is being investigated