File
A
Document A-5785
AI Analysis
Summary: The deponent, Edelstein, testifies about their conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1, Catherine M. Conrad, and the investigation into her background. Edelstein assumed Conrad was telling the truth about her education and background during voir dire, and did not ask Trzaskoma for underlying documents supporting her concerns. The conversation highlights potential issues with the juror's identity and the handling of the investigation.
Significance: This deposition reveals potential issues with Juror No. 1's identity and the investigation that followed, which could be significant to the trial's outcome and potential appeals.
Key Topics:
Juror No. 1's identity and background
Investigation into Juror No. 1's potential connection to a suspended New York attorney
Conversation between the deponent and Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1
Key People:
- Ms. Conrad (Catherine M. Conrad) - Juror No. 1 in a trial
- Ms. Trzaskoma (Theresa Trzaskoma) - Person who raised concerns about Juror No. 1's identity
- Edelstein - Deponent, likely a lawyer or investigator involved in the case