File
A
Document A-5783
AI Analysis
Summary: The deposition transcript discusses Ms. Edelstein's reaction to learning about a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad and whether Juror No. 1 could be the same person. Ms. Edelstein initially thought it was impossible due to Juror No. 1's voir dire responses, specifically her education level. The questioning focuses on whether further investigation was warranted to verify Juror No. 1's identity.
Significance: This document is potentially important because it reveals the questioning of a key individual (Ms. Edelstein) about a potentially significant issue: whether Juror No. 1 is the same person as a suspended attorney with a similar name.
Key Topics:
Juror No. 1's identity and background
Catherine Conrad, a suspended New York attorney
Voir dire responses and investigation steps
Key People:
- Ms. Edelstein - deponent
- Catherine Conrad - suspended New York attorney and potentially Juror No. 1
- Juror No. 1 - juror in a trial