File
A
Document A-5768
AI Analysis
Summary: The document is a transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Brune, discussing the investigation into Juror No. 1 and potential appellate issues. Brune testifies that his firm did not investigate Juror No. 1 further after the verdict. The witness denies attempting to 'sandbag' the court or plant error in the record regarding Juror No. 1.
Significance: This document is potentially important as it reveals the testimony of a key witness regarding the investigation into Juror No. 1 and potential appellate issues.
Key Topics:
Juror misconduct
Appellate issues
Investigation into Juror No. 1
Key People:
- Brune - Witness being cross-examined
- Shechtman - Prosecutor or attorney conducting cross-examination
- Davis - Attorney conducting redirect examination
- Conrad - Juror No. 1, subject of investigation