File
A
Document A-5766
AI Analysis
Summary: The transcript captures the cross-examination of Ms. Brune, where she is questioned about the firm's decision-making process during jury selection, specifically regarding Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, and whether she was believed to be a suspended lawyer. Ms. Brune testifies that they did not believe Catherine Conrad was a suspended lawyer based on her responses during voir dire.
Significance: This document is potentially important as it reveals the thought process behind the firm's decisions during jury selection and their understanding of a juror's eligibility.
Key Topics:
Jury selection process
Juror eligibility and challenges
Potential juror's (Catherine Conrad) status as a suspended lawyer
Key People:
- Ms. Brune - Witness being cross-examined
- Mr. Shechtman - Attorney conducting cross-examination
- Catherine Conrad - Juror No. 1 whose eligibility is being discussed
- Judge Pauley - Judge who conducted voir dire