File
A
Document A-5738
AI Analysis
Summary: Ms. Brune testifies about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1's identity, stating that Ms. Trzaskoma expressed doubts but did not mention a Westlaw report. Ms. Brune concludes that Juror No. 1 is who she claimed to be.
Significance: This deposition testimony is potentially important as it sheds light on the investigation into Juror No. 1's identity and the discussions surrounding a potentially suspicious juror.
Key Topics:
Discussion about Juror No. 1's identity
Conversation between Ms. Brune and Ms. Trzaskoma regarding a potentially suspicious juror
Mention of a Westlaw report and its absence from the conversation
Key People:
- Ms. Brune - Witness being deposed
- Ms. Trzaskoma - Person who had a conversation with Ms. Brune about Juror No. 1
- Laurie Edelstein - Colleague of Ms. Brune, referenced for her thoroughness
- Catherine Conrad - Suspended attorney potentially matching Juror No. 1's identity
- Judge Pauley - Judge before whom Juror No. 1 was sworn