File
A
Document A-5720
AI Analysis
Summary: The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her decision not to research a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, before voir dire. Ms. Brune admits she had the resources and opportunity to do so but chose not to, instead relying on the voir dire process. The questioning highlights the availability of a large team to assist with research.
Significance: This deposition reveals the witness's decision-making process regarding juror research and highlights potential issues with the voir dire process.
Key Topics:
Voir dire process
Juror research
Catherine M. Conrad identification
Key People:
- Ms. Brune - Witness being deposed
- Catherine M. Conrad - Potential juror
- Judge Pauley - Presiding judge
- Ms. Trzaskoma - Team member or associate