File
A
Document A-5718
AI Analysis
Summary: The witness discusses their firm's receipt and analysis of juror information and research conducted before voir dire. They confirm having access to a specific 2010 suspension opinion related to Catherine M. Conrad, although there is a dispute about when it was shown to them.
Significance: This deposition transcript reveals details about the preparation and information available to the legal team during the pre-voir dire stage, potentially impacting jury selection and trial strategy.
Key Topics:
pre-voir dire stage procedures
juror list analysis
access to specific legal documents
Key People:
- Theresa Trzaskoma - colleague or team member involved in jury research
- Dennis Donahue - jury consultant
- Catherine M. Conrad - subject of a 2010 suspension opinion