File
A
Document A-5646
AI Analysis
Summary: The transcript shows a juror, Ms. Conrad, being questioned about her residence and personal life. She initially claimed to reside in Bronxville, Westchester County, but later admitted to living on Barker Avenue in the Bronx. The questioning attorney is trying to establish that she was dishonest during voir dire and potentially biased.
Significance: This document is potentially important because it reveals a juror's potential dishonesty during voir dire and raises questions about her credibility and potential bias, which could impact the validity of the trial's outcome.
Key Topics:
Juror's residence and potential dishonesty during voir dire
Juror's personal life and family background
Questioning the juror's credibility and potential bias
Key People:
- Conrad - Juror No. 3 being questioned
- MR. GAIR - Prosecutor or attorney questioning Juror Conrad
- MR. OKULA - Attorney who did not object to the admission of PMD Exhibit 2
- Judge Pauley - The presiding judge
- Paul M. Daugerdas - Defendant in the case