File
920
Document 920
AI Analysis
Summary: The plaintiff argues that Ghislaine Maxwell has not provided sufficient information about the criminal investigation to justify staying discovery, and that the potential claims resolution program does not require staying discovery in this case. The court has previously recognized that discovery may be necessary to inform the claims resolution program.
Significance: This document is potentially important because it reveals the arguments made by the plaintiff against staying discovery in a civil case involving Ghislaine Maxwell, despite a parallel criminal investigation and a potential claims resolution program.
Key Topics:
Motion to stay discovery due to a parallel criminal investigation
Potential claims resolution program for Jeffrey Epstein's victims
Ghislaine Maxwell's discovery obligations in a civil case
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant in the civil case
- Jeffrey Epstein - Deceased individual whose estate is a co-defendant
- Debra C. Freeman - Judge presiding over the case