File
732
Document 732
AI Analysis
Summary: Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney responds to motions to quash a subpoena to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, arguing that the subpoena is narrow, specific, and relevant to her defense, and that the Court should deny the motions to quash. The subpoena seeks documents related to the accusers' claims and payouts from the EVCP.
Significance: This document is a crucial court filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, as it relates to her efforts to obtain evidence from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, which may be relevant to her defense and confrontation of accusers.
Key Topics:
Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 17(c) subpoena to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP)
Motions to quash the subpoena filed by the government and accusers
Admissibility and relevance of the subpoenaed documents
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge
- Jeffrey S. Pagliuca - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Accuser-1 - Alleged victim and witness
- Accuser-2 - Alleged victim and witness
- Witness-3 - Alleged victim and witness
- Accuser-4 - Alleged victim and witness