File
723
Document 723
AI Analysis
Summary: The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that the testimony of Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, and Kelly Bovino is relevant, material, and exculpatory, contradicting Jane's testimony about group sexualized massages involving Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The defense asserts that excluding this testimony would violate Maxwell's right to present a defense and confront her accusers.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals the defense's argument for admitting testimony from key witnesses that contradicts the prosecution's main witness, Jane, and is crucial to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense.
Key Topics:
Admissibility of testimony from Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, and Kelly Bovino
Relevance and materiality of witness testimony
Confrontation Clause and right to present a defense
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge
- Jeffrey S. Pagliuca - Defense Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Jane - Prosecution Witness
- Eva Dubin - Defense Witness
- Michelle Healy - Defense Witness
- Kelly Bovino - Defense Witness