File
719
Document 719
AI Analysis
Summary: The defense is arguing that the 1996 Agreement for Sale of 44 Kinnerton Street is admissible as impeachment evidence against Kate, a prosecution witness, as it contradicts her testimony about visiting Ghislaine Maxwell's home in 1994. The prosecution is objecting to the introduction of this evidence, claiming that the defense failed to disclose it in a timely manner.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals a dispute between the defense and prosecution over the admissibility of evidence that could potentially impeach a key prosecution witness.
Key Topics:
Ghislaine Maxwell trial
Discovery of 1996 Agreement for Sale of 44 Kinnerton Street
Impeachment evidence against witness Kate
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Court Judge
- Kate - Witness for the prosecution
- Jeffrey S. Pagliuca - Defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell