File
690
Document 690
AI Analysis
Summary: The court rules on Ghislaine Maxwell's motion in limine to exclude Witness-3's testimony, concluding that some testimony may be direct evidence of the Mann Act counts and admissible under Rule 404(b) to prove motive, intent, and knowledge. The court limits the testimony to minimize prejudice under Rule 403.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals the court's ruling on the admissibility of Witness-3's testimony in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, and provides insight into the court's application of Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 403.
Key Topics:
Admissibility of Witness-3's testimony
Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 403
Ghislaine Maxwell's motion in limine
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - District Judge
- Witness-3 (Accuser-3) - Witness for the prosecution