File
653
Document 653
AI Analysis
Summary: The document is a court filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where the defendant moved for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, alleging that Juror 50 provided inaccurate information during jury selection. The court conducted a post-trial hearing and ultimately denied the motion, finding that Juror 50's inaccurate answers were not deliberate and that he was not biased.
Significance: This document is significant because it addresses the defendant's motion for a new trial based on allegations of juror misconduct and the court's decision to deny the motion.
Key Topics:
Jury Selection Process
Juror Misconduct Allegations
Motion for a New Trial
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - Circuit Judge, sitting by designation
- Juror 50 - Juror whose actions are under scrutiny