File
648
Document 648
AI Analysis
Summary: The government opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial, arguing that Juror 50 did not deliberately lie during voir dire and that even if he had disclosed being a victim of sexual abuse, it wouldn't have been a valid basis for a challenge for cause. The government contends that Maxwell received a fair trial and that the verdict's integrity remains intact.
Significance: This document is significant because it presents the government's opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial, focusing on allegations of juror misconduct and the implications for the trial's integrity.
Key Topics:
Motion for a new trial
Juror misconduct allegations
Voir dire and juror questionnaire process
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Damian Williams - United States Attorney
- Juror 50 - Juror whose actions are under scrutiny