File
600
Document 600
AI Analysis
Summary: This omnibus memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in support of her post-trial motions challenges her convictions on multiple grounds. The document argues that there was a constructive amendment/variance in the Mann Act counts, that the conspiracy counts are multiplicitous, and that there was significant pre-indictment delay. The memorandum cites various legal precedents and statutes to support its arguments.
Significance: This document is significant as it outlines Ghislaine Maxwell's post-trial motions, challenging her convictions on various grounds including constructive amendment/variance, multiplicity of conspiracy counts, and pre-indictment delay.
Key Topics:
Constructive Amendment/Variance in Mann Act Counts
Multiplicity of Conspiracy Counts
Pre-Indictment Delay and its Impact on the Trial
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Christian R. Everdell - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Jeffrey S. Pagliuca - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Laura A. Menninger - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Bobbi C. Sternheim - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell