File
596
Document 596
AI Analysis
Summary: The court denies Ghislaine Maxwell's request to temporarily seal documents related to her motion for a new trial, instead allowing for narrowly tailored redactions to protect juror anonymity and the integrity of any potential inquiry. The court also denies Juror 50's motion to intervene but allows the motion to be docketed as it is a judicial document subject to public access.
Significance: This court order addresses the defendant's request to seal documents related to her motion for a new trial and a juror's motion to intervene, establishing the court's stance on public access to judicial documents and the balance between transparency and protecting juror anonymity.
Key Topics:
Motion to seal documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial
Juror 50's motion to intervene
Redactions to judicial documents to protect juror anonymity and privacy
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - District Judge
- Juror 50 - Juror who filed a motion to intervene