File
594
Document 594
AI Analysis
Summary: The government filed a response to the defendant's letter requesting that her motion for a new trial and its exhibits be sealed. The government argues that the defendant's motion is a 'judicial document' subject to a presumption of public access and that sealing is not justified. The government also requests that the court adopt proposed redactions to the government's opposition brief to protect the privacy interests of prospective jurors.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals the government's argument against sealing the defendant's motion for a new trial and its exhibits, and highlights the tension between the right to a fair trial and the public's right to access judicial documents.
Key Topics:
Sealing of court documents
Motion for a new trial
Public access to judicial documents
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge
- Juror 50 - Juror in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial