THE VAULT
@xLatke

The Vault

The Public Record — Documenting the Epstein case files

← Back to home

Document 576

AI Analysis

Summary: The court orders the parties to brief the issue of whether an inquiry into juror matters is permitted and/or required before considering Juror 50's motion to intervene and access juror information. The court temporarily seals Juror 50's motion and adjusts the briefing schedule to coincide with Defendant's anticipated motion for a new trial.
Significance: This document is significant as it reveals the court's decision to temporarily seal Juror 50's motion and to require briefing on the appropriateness of an inquiry into juror matters before considering the motion, potentially impacting the handling of post-trial juror contact.
Key Topics: Juror 50's motion to intervene and access juror questionnaire and voir dire Appropriateness of inquiry into juror matters Briefing schedule for Defendant's anticipated motion for a new trial
Key People:
  • Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge
  • Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant