THE VAULT
@xLatke

The Vault

The Public Record — Documenting the Epstein case files

← Back to home

Document 553

AI Analysis

Summary: The document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing that prior inconsistent statements can be proven by extrinsic evidence under Rule 613, even if the witness agrees that the statement is contained in certain material but denies making or remembering it.
Significance: This document is a response to a court order regarding the admissibility of prior inconsistent statements under Federal Rule of Evidence 613, which is crucial for the defense of Ghislaine Maxwell.
Key Topics: Federal Rule of Evidence 613 Prior Inconsistent Statements Extrinsic Evidence
Key People:
  • Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
  • Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge
  • Jeffrey S. Pagliuca - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell