File
547
Document 547
AI Analysis
Summary: The defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the government's attempt to limit Dr. Loftus's expert testimony on the science of memory and suggestive questioning. The letter cites examples from witness testimony and government interviews, asserting that the government's actions are an effort to restrict relevant testimony and undermine the defendant's right to a defense.
Significance: This document is potentially important as it reveals the defense's argument against the government's attempt to limit Dr. Loftus's expert testimony, which could impact the trial's outcome. It highlights the defense's contention that the government's actions are an effort to restrict relevant testimony.
Key Topics:
Limitation on expert testimony
Suggestive questioning during witness interviews
Relevance of Dr. Loftus's testimony on memory science
Key People:
- Bobbi C. Sternheim - Defense Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Dr. Loftus - Expert Witness for the Defense
- Agent Young - Government Witness
- Jane - Witness for the Government
- Dr. Rocchio - Expert Witness for the Government
- AUSA Rossmiller - Assistant United States Attorney