File
525
Document 525
AI Analysis
Summary: The defense responds to the government's letter arguing that the '900 series photos' of Jeffrey Epstein's apartment are inadmissible due to lack of authentication and relevance, as they were taken in 2019, long after the alleged events. The defense argues that without testimony confirming the photos accurately depict the apartment during the relevant time period, they are irrelevant and potentially misleading. The court had previously sustained the defense's objection to the photos' admission.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals a dispute between the defense and prosecution over the admissibility of certain photographic evidence in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, highlighting issues of authentication, relevance, and potential prejudice.
Key Topics:
Admissibility of photographic evidence
Authentication of evidence
Relevance and potential prejudice of evidence under Rules 401 and 403
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge
- Jeffrey S. Pagliuca - Defense Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Jane - Witness/testifying victim