File
519
Document 519
AI Analysis
Summary: The defense attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell object to the government's overly broad proposal to protect the anonymity of certain witnesses, arguing it would unfairly constrain Maxwell's ability to confront her accusers. The defense notes inconsistencies between the government's proposal and their own direct examination of a witness. The attorneys agree to remain mindful of protecting witness anonymity while reserving the right to confront their accusers.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals a dispute between the defense and prosecution regarding the protection of witness anonymity and the scope of cross-examination in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
Key Topics:
Protecting anonymity of testifying witnesses
Government's proposal to restrict cross-examination
Confrontation rights under the Sixth Amendment
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge
- Jeffrey S. Pagliuca - Defense Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell