File
517
Document 517
AI Analysis
Summary: The Government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that the defense must disclose exhibits they intend to introduce through Government witnesses as part of their case-in-chief, and that extrinsic evidence for impeachment is narrowly circumscribed. The Government requests that the defense be precluded from offering further undisclosed exhibits absent a showing of cause or an articulation of a valid theory of admissibility.
Significance: This document is significant because it clarifies the disclosure requirements for the defense in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, specifically regarding the distinction between impeachment evidence and case-in-chief evidence.
Key Topics:
Disclosure requirements under Rule 16
Impeachment evidence vs. case-in-chief evidence
Admissibility of extrinsic evidence
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge
- Damian Williams - United States Attorney
- Maurene Comey - Assistant United States Attorney
- Alison Moe - Assistant United States Attorney
- Lara Pomerantz - Assistant United States Attorney
- Andrew Rohrbach - Assistant United States Attorney