File
494
Document 494
AI Analysis
Summary: The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that Accuser-3's evidence is not direct evidence of the sex trafficking conspiracy charged in Count Five and should be excluded under Rule 404(b) and Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The government had argued that Accuser-3's evidence is admissible to prove the sex trafficking conspiracy, but the defense counters that the government's arguments are meritless and based on flawed assumptions.
Significance: This document is a crucial court filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, discussing the admissibility of Accuser-3's evidence and its relevance to the sex trafficking conspiracy charged in Count Five.
Key Topics:
Admissibility of Accuser-3's evidence
Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Related to Accuser-3
Sex trafficking conspiracy charged in Count Five
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge
- Christian R. Everdell - Defense Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Jeffrey Epstein - Co-conspirator