File
453
Document 453
AI Analysis
Summary: Ghislaine Maxwell's reply in support of her motions in limine argues that the government failed to comply with court orders regarding disclosure of co-conspirator statements and 404(b) evidence. The filing also seeks to exclude expert testimony from Lisa Rocchio and certain other evidence related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Significance: This document is a crucial court filing in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, outlining her legal arguments for excluding certain evidence and testimony. It provides insight into the defense's strategy and the government's anticipated evidence.
Key Topics:
Admissibility of co-conspirator statements
Exclusion of certain evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)
Exclusion of expert testimony under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Jeffrey Epstein - Alleged co-conspirator
- Lisa Rocchio - Proposed expert witness