File
443
Document 443
AI Analysis
Summary: Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team files a motion to exclude the proposed testimony of a government expert witness under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, arguing that the expert's opinions on grooming and victim behavior are unreliable and prejudicial.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals the defense's strategy to challenge the government's expert witness and potentially exclude damaging testimony in a high-profile child sexual abuse case.
Key Topics:
Admissibility of expert testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to exclude proposed testimony of government expert
Relevance and reliability of expert opinions on grooming and victim behavior in child sexual abuse cases
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Rocchio - Proposed government expert witness