File
398
Document 398
AI Analysis
Summary: Ghislaine Maxwell's reply in support of her motions in limine argues that the government failed to comply with court orders and disclosure requirements, and seeks to exclude various pieces of evidence and testimony, including co-conspirator statements, 404(b) evidence, and expert testimony from Lisa Rocchio.
Significance: This document is a crucial court filing in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, outlining her arguments for excluding certain evidence and testimony, and potentially impacting the trial's outcome.
Key Topics:
Admissibility of co-conspirator statements
Exclusion of certain evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)
Exclusion of expert testimony under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Jeffrey Epstein - Alleged co-conspirator
- Lisa Rocchio - Proposed expert witness