File
389
Document 389
AI Analysis
Summary: Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys filed a motion in limine to exclude evidence of her alleged false statements in civil depositions and to redact related allegations from the superseding indictment, arguing that such evidence is unduly prejudicial and irrelevant to the remaining charges.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals the defense's strategy to exclude potentially prejudicial evidence and allegations related to Ghislaine Maxwell's alleged perjury, which were previously severed from the main trial.
Key Topics:
Exclusion of evidence related to perjury counts
Redaction of allegations from the superseding indictment
Ghislaine Maxwell's alleged false statements in civil depositions
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Jeffrey Epstein - Co-conspirator/alleged accomplice
- Christian R. Everdell - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Jeffrey S. Pagliuca - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Laura A. Menninger - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Bobbi C. Sternheim - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell