File
35
Document 35
AI Analysis
Summary: The letter is from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorneys to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing against the government's proposed language for a protective order, specifically regarding referencing individuals who have publicly identified themselves. Maxwell's defense team asserts that individuals who have publicly spoken about their allegations against Maxwell or Epstein should not be considered to have privacy interests that need protection.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals the ongoing legal dispute between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team and the government regarding the terms of a protective order, particularly concerning the referencing of individuals who have publicly identified themselves in relation to Maxwell or Epstein.
Key Topics:
Protective Order in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Referencing Individuals Who Have Publicly Identified Themselves
Privacy Interests of Alleged Victims
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Jeffrey Epstein - Related individual in previous case
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge
- Mark S. Cohen - Defense Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Christian R. Everdell - Defense Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell