File
338
Document 338
AI Analysis
Summary: David A. Diehl filed a motion to intervene in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, arguing that his interests were not adequately represented regarding the statute of limitations argument under 18 U.S.C. §3283. The motion was denied by Judge Alison J. Nathan. Diehl's filing includes a detailed analysis of the legislative history and interpretation of §3283.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals a third-party attempt to intervene in a high-profile case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) and challenges the interpretation of a specific statute (18 U.S.C. §3283) related to the statute of limitations for certain offenses.
Key Topics:
Motion to Intervene
Statute of Limitations (18 U.S.C. §3283)
Interpretation of 'offense involving' in 18 U.S.C. §3283
Key People:
- David A. Diehl - Movant seeking to intervene in the case
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant in the main case
- Alison J. Nathan - U.S. District Judge who denied the motion to intervene