File
334
Document 334
AI Analysis
Summary: The court denies Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to authorize subpoenas to four individuals, citing failure to meet the Nixon test for relevance, admissibility, and specificity. The court finds that the requested materials are not evidentiary or are otherwise procurable, and that the subpoenas would amount to a 'fishing expedition'.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals the court's decision on Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to authorize subpoenas, which is a crucial aspect of her defense strategy. The ruling provides insight into the court's interpretation of Rule 17(c) and its application to the case.
Key Topics:
Rule 17(c) subpoena
Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for subpoena authorization
Relevance and admissibility of evidence
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - District Judge