File
323
Document 323
AI Analysis
Summary: The defense attorney, Christian R. Everdell, informs Judge Alison J. Nathan that Ghislaine Maxwell does not seek redactions to the Court's sealed Opinion and Order or the underlying motion papers. The defense argues that it is not their burden to justify redactions and that the government should bear the burden under the Lugosch test. The defense has no objection to redacting personal email addresses of certain individuals.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals the defense's position on redactions to court documents and the Protective Order, and it may impact the disclosure of sensitive information in the case.
Key Topics:
Redactions to court documents
Protective Order in the case
Disclosure of accusers' and witnesses' names
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Christian R. Everdell - Defense Attorney
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge