File
286
Document 286
AI Analysis
Summary: Ghislaine Maxwell's reply memorandum argues that allegations regarding Accuser-3 should be stricken from the superseding indictment because they are irrelevant and prejudicial. The government concedes that it cannot charge Maxwell with a substantive offense against Accuser-3 due to the statute of limitations and lack of evidence.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals the defense's argument that certain allegations in the indictment are prejudicial and should be stricken, and the government's concessions regarding the limitations of their case.
Key Topics:
Motion to Strike Surplusage from Superseding Indictment
Relevance and admissibility of allegations regarding Accuser-3
Prejudicial effect of allegations regarding Accuser-3
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Jeffrey Epstein - Co-conspirator
- Accuser-3 (Minor Victim-3) - Alleged victim