File
28509
Document 28509
AI Analysis
Summary: The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the deposition limit in a defamation case, arguing that certain individuals' testimony is irrelevant or cumulative. The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, opposes the request, citing the simplicity of the defamation case and the lack of information provided by the plaintiff about the expected testimony of certain individuals.
Significance: This document is potentially important because it reveals the defendant's argument against exceeding the presumptive deposition limit and highlights the relevance of certain testimony in a defamation case.
Key Topics:
deposition limits
relevance of testimony
defamation case
Key People:
- Plaintiff (Jane Doe No. #3) - the plaintiff in the defamation case
- Ms. Maxwell - the defendant in the defamation case
- Jeffrey Epstein - individual associated with the plaintiff and defendant
- Nadia Marcinkova - potential deponent
- Sarah Kellen - potential deponent
- Rinaldo Rizzo - potential deponent
- Jean Luc Brunel - potential deponent