File
247
Document 247
AI Analysis
Summary: Boies Schiller Flexner LLP objects to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for an order authorizing a subpoena, arguing that it is an improper attempt to obtain discovery beyond what is required under Rule 16 and Brady. The law firm contends that Maxwell's requests lack specificity as required by United States v. Nixon.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals a dispute between Ghislaine Maxwell and Boies Schiller Flexner LLP regarding a Rule 17(c) subpoena and highlights the specificity requirements for subpoenas in criminal cases.
Key Topics:
Rule 17(c) subpoena
Discovery obligations
Specificity requirement for subpoenas
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Sigrid S. McCawley - Attorney for Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge