File
242
Document 242
AI Analysis
Summary: The court grants Ghislaine Maxwell's request to redact parts of her response to a court order, citing the need to protect the privacy interests of defense lawyers' clients and comply with professional obligations. The court applies the three-part test from Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga to reach this decision. Maxwell is ordered to docket the redacted version and the basis for the redaction request.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals the court's reasoning for allowing redactions to Ghislaine Maxwell's court filing, balancing the presumption of access against privacy interests and professional obligations.
Key Topics:
Ghislaine Maxwell's response to court order
Redactions to court filing
Presumption of access to judicial documents
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge