File
227
Document 227
AI Analysis
Summary: The Government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan stating they won't use certain materials subject to suppression motions in their case-in-chief at Ghislaine Maxwell's trial, but reserves the right to use them if the defense puts these materials at issue or if the defendant testifies. The Government opposes the suppression motions and argues that even if materials are suppressed, they can still be used for impeachment or other permissible purposes under the Rules of Evidence.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals the Government's position on using potentially suppressed materials at trial and their intention not to use them in their case-in-chief, while reserving the right to use them under certain circumstances.
Key Topics:
Suppression Motions
Evidence Usage at Trial
Admissibility of Potentially Suppressed Materials
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge
- Audrey Strauss - United States Attorney
- Alison Moe - Assistant United States Attorney
- Maurene Comey - Assistant United States Attorney
- Lara Pomerantz - Assistant United States Attorney
- Andrew Rohrbach - Assistant United States Attorney