File
225
Document 225
AI Analysis
Summary: The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell informs the court that the defense agrees that the motion to dismiss the S1 superseding indictment is moot due to the return of the S2 superseding indictment by a grand jury in Manhattan. The letter is in response to the court's Opinion and Order dated April 16, 2021. The case is United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
Significance: This document is significant because it shows the defense's agreement that a motion to dismiss the indictment is moot due to a superseding indictment being returned by a different grand jury.
Key Topics:
Ghislaine Maxwell case
motion to dismiss indictment
grand jury proceedings
Key People:
- Christian R. Everdell - Defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - United States District Judge