File
22285
Document 22285
AI Analysis
Summary: The defense and the court agree that Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss the S1 superseding indictment is moot due to the return of a new S2 superseding indictment by a Manhattan grand jury. The court denies the motion as moot. The document is a letter from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
Significance: This document is significant as it shows the court's ruling on a motion to dismiss a superseding indictment and highlights the procedural developments in the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
Key Topics:
Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss superseding indictment
Grand jury location (White Plains vs Manhattan)
Mootness of motion due to new superseding indictment
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Alison J. Nathan - U.S. District Judge
- Christian R. Everdell - Defense Attorney