File
210
Document 210
AI Analysis
Summary: Ghislaine Maxwell's reply memorandum argues that Counts 1 and 3 of the superseding indictment are multiplicitous and requests the court to dismiss one of the counts. The government is accused of overcharging and potentially prejudicing the jury.
Significance: This document is significant because it reveals the defense's argument that the indictment is multiplicitous and prejudicial, and requests the court to require the government to elect which conspiracy charge to prosecute.
Key Topics:
Multiplicity of charges in the indictment
Motion to dismiss counts in the superseding indictment
Conspiracy charges against Ghislaine Maxwell
Key People:
- Ghislaine Maxwell - Defendant
- Jeffrey S. Pagliuca - Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell